Guide

AI for Japanese companies in Thailand: Japan's rules or Thai law?

Treepob Tiangtrong (Champ) · Founder and CEO, TRAINIAC · 4 Nov 2026

TL;DR Japanese companies in Thailand must follow Thai law first, such as the PDPA. Japan's AI Guidelines for Business v1.2 from MIC and METI are voluntary soft law, and Japan's AI law has no penalties. This guide compares both sides and gives subsidiaries a five-step template.

Japanese companies in Thailand must follow Thai law first, such as the Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA) and the Cybersecurity Act. Japan's rules arrive as head-office policy. The key document is the AI Guidelines for Business from the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications (MIC) and the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI), Version 1.2 (31 Mar 2026). The document itself says it is soft law with no legal force. It does not address overseas subsidiaries directly, but it says businesses that operate across borders should comply with local law. Japan's AI law (Act No. 53 of 2025), in full effect since 1 Sep 2025, is a promotion law with no penalties. In practice, a Thai subsidiary works on two layers. It takes the group's AI policy from Japan, then adds the Thai legal duties that head office did not write. Data from the Japan External Trade Organization (JETRO) shows this affects many companies. 6,083 Japanese companies are still operating in Thailand (2024 survey). In the 2025 survey, 46.1% of Japanese companies in Thailand used or invested in digital technology, below the ASEAN average. This article has a table comparing Japan's rules with Thailand's, what the Japanese guidelines expect from AI users with the Thai duties to pair with them, and a template of what a subsidiary must add itself.

Checked against official documents from the Government of Japan, JETRO and Thai law on 24 Oct 2026. This article is not legal advice.

Japan's rules and Thailand's rules

JapanThailand
AI-specific lawAct No. 53 of 2025, a promotion law with no penalties, in full effect from 1 Sep 2025No AI law in force yet
Guidelines for businessAI Guidelines for Business Version 1.2 (31 Mar 2026), voluntaryAI guidance from the Office of the Personal Data Protection Committee (PDPC, สคส.), 7 Oct 2026, and the Generative AI guidance of the Electronic Transactions Development Agency (ETDA). Neither is binding
Personal dataJapan's own lawThe PDPA is in force and applies to employee and customer data in Thailand
National planThe second AI Basic Plan, approved by the Cabinet on 14 Jul 2026, names cooperation with ASEANETDA's draft Artificial Intelligence Act is still a draft
From the Cabinet Office AI Act page, MIC's AI Guidelines for Business page and official Thai documents, checked 24 Oct 2026

The Japanese guidelines split the parties into three roles: AI developers, AI providers and AI business users. One company can hold several roles. A Thai subsidiary that uses Claude, Microsoft Copilot, ChatGPT or Gemini in daily work is mainly an AI business user.

What the Japanese guidelines expect, and the Thai duties to pair with them

What the AI Guidelines for Business expect from AI usersWhat a Thai subsidiary must add
Use AI within the scope the provider sets, and understand the accuracy and risks of the output before using itChoose enterprise tools whose contract bars using your data to train models, and run a DPIA for work that uses personal data
Do not enter personal or confidential data inappropriatelyCheck the legal basis for processing under the PDPA and cross-border transfers under sections 28–29, including transfers back to head office
When AI is used to assess people, tell the people being assessed, keep a human making the decision with care for automation bias, and be able to explain when askedHR work in Thailand that uses AI to screen or assess staff must meet both the PDPA and the PDPC guidance
Make sure people who work with AI have AI literacy that fits their workRun training in the language Thai staff actually use, and claim the training-cost deduction under the conditions of the Department of Skill Development (กรมพัฒนาฝีมือแรงงาน)
Left column summarised from Part 5 and principle 8 of AI Guidelines for Business Version 1.2 · right column is a TRAINIAC template based on Thai law

For how to run a DPIA, see the DPIA template for AI projects (in Thai). For the conditions of the training-cost deduction, see the guide to the 200% tax deduction. For the full status of Thai law, see Thailand's AI laws and guidelines (in Thai).

An example the guidelines give in an appendix is SoftBank, which applied its AI ethics policy to 89 group companies as of Dec 2025. The example is not a requirement. But it reflects that many Japanese head offices send policy down to the whole group.

Where Japanese companies in Thailand stand

  • Number. JETRO Bangkok confirms 6,083 companies that have at least 10% Japanese shareholding and are still operating. About 40% (39.6%) are in manufacturing, and 51.7% have their main office in Bangkok.
  • Digital use. JETRO's 2025 survey of Japanese companies overseas found that 46.1% of companies in Thailand used or invested in digital technology, compared with 52.1% across ASEAN.
  • Plans and barriers. Across all countries, AI ranks second among the technologies companies plan to expand (49.6%), after cloud. The top barrier is a shortage of digital talent (60.7%).

We have not found an official figure for the share of Japanese companies in Thailand that use generative AI.

Template: what a subsidiary must add itself

  1. Ask head office for the group AI policy and the list of tools the group has approved, such as Microsoft 365 Copilot if the company uses the same tenant as the group.
  2. Compare it with Thai law. Add the PDPA, cross-border data transfers and breach notification within 72 hours (PDPA and AI use (in Thai)).
  3. Write a Thai-language policy that Thai staff can read and understand, not just a translation from Japanese or English (AI policy for Thai organisations (in Thai)).
  4. Train by role. Japanese executives, Thai managers and frontline staff use AI differently, so the teaching language may need to differ too.
  5. Report back to head office with the same measures the group uses (measuring the results of AI use (in Thai)).

Training we have delivered at Japanese group companies

DateOrganisationCourseNotes from our work log
19 Oct 2026Mitsui & Co.Microsoft Copilot PremiumCohort 2 of 4 · learner evaluation 4.94/5.00
8 Oct 2026Mitsui & Co.Microsoft Copilot PremiumCohort 1 of 4
1 Sep 2026Siam Kubota LeasingConsulting on an internal AI project3rd engagement · supporting the team that builds internal AI tools
18 Dec 2025Thai Toshiba LightingGenerative AI for WorkforceCohort 1
16 Jun 2025DaikinMicrosoft Copilot for WorkforceFactory staff
From TRAINIAC's dated training work log

Every engagement in the table comes from our dated training work log.

Sources

Read next

If your company uses Microsoft 365 across the group, see planning a Copilot rollout in the organisation (in Thai) and Microsoft Copilot pricing (in Thai), or see our corporate AI training in detail.

Frequently asked questions

Must Japanese companies in Thailand follow Japan's AI Guidelines for Business?
They have no legal force. The AI Guidelines for Business from MIC and METI describe themselves as voluntary soft law, and say that businesses operating across borders should comply with local law. But many head offices adopt the guidelines as group policy. So a Thai subsidiary usually has to follow group policy alongside Thai law.Source: AI Guidelines for Business Ver1.2 (English) · MIC and METI
What is the latest version of the AI Guidelines for Business?
Version 1.2, dated 31 Mar 2026. The first version came out on 19 Apr 2024. Version 1.2 adds definitions of AI agents and physical AI. The guidelines split the parties into AI developers, AI providers and AI business users, and set 10 common principles.Source: AI Guidelines for Business · MIC
Does Japan's AI law have penalties?
No. The law promoting AI research and use (Act No. 53 of 2025) is a promotion law, in full effect since 1 Sep 2025. It asks businesses to endeavour to use AI and to cooperate with government measures, and it sets up an AI Strategy Headquarters chaired by the Prime Minister.Source: AI Act (AI法) · Cabinet Office of JapanSource: Overview of the AI Act (English) · Cabinet Office of Japan
What do the Japanese guidelines expect from companies that use AI?
AI business users are expected to use AI within the scope the provider sets, understand the risks of the output before using it, and not enter personal or confidential data inappropriately. When AI is used to assess people, a human should make the decision with care for automation bias. People who work with AI should have AI literacy that fits their work.Source: AI Guidelines for Business Ver1.2 (English) · MIC and METI
How many Japanese companies are there in Thailand?
JETRO Bangkok confirms 6,083 companies that have at least 10% Japanese shareholding and are still operating, from its 2024 survey. About 40% are in manufacturing, and 51.7% have their main office in Bangkok.Source: Survey of Japanese-affiliated companies in Thailand, FY2024 (タイ日系企業進出動向調査 2024年度) · JETRO
How much do Japanese companies in Thailand use digital technology and AI?
JETRO's 2025 survey found that 46.1% of Japanese companies in Thailand used or invested in digital technology, below the ASEAN average of 52.1%. Across all countries, AI ranks second among the technologies companies plan to expand (49.6%), and the top barrier is a shortage of digital talent (60.7%).Source: FY2025 Survey on Business Conditions of Japanese Companies Overseas, Asia and Oceania (2025年度 海外進出日系企業実態調査 アジア・オセアニア編) · JETRO

This guide is the English version of the Thai article.

Contact

Talk to us about training your team

Send a rough brief — how many people, which functions, and what they should be able to do afterwards — and we reply with a format and a quotation. We correspond in English or Thai; quotations and documents are issued by Trainiac Co., Ltd. for your procurement process.

LINE Official Account
@trainiac